# Specification Quality Checklist: Quality Gates & Code Hygiene

**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
**Created**: 2026-03-10
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)

## Content Quality

- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
- [x] All mandatory sections completed

## Requirement Completeness

- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
- [x] Edge cases are identified
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified

## Feature Readiness

- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification

## Notes

- All items pass. The spec references specific files (set-initiative.ts, combatant-row.tsx, biome.json) as context for the hygiene fixes, which is appropriate for a code-quality feature — these are the *targets* of the work, not implementation prescriptions.
- Success criteria SC-001 mentions tool names (knip, biome, tsc, vitest, jscpd, pnpm audit) because this feature is specifically about configuring quality tooling — these are the *subject matter*, not implementation details.