Implement the 031-quality-gates-hygiene feature that strengthens automated quality gates by adding pnpm audit to the check script, v8 coverage thresholds with per-directory auto-ratchet (domain 96%, adapters 71%, persistence 87%), Biome cognitive complexity enforcement (max 15), and keyboard accessibility for the combatant row, while cleaning up all blanket biome-ignore comments, refactoring 5 overly complex functions into smaller helpers, and codifying the early-enforcement principle in the constitution and CLAUDE.md
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
35
specs/031-quality-gates-hygiene/checklists/requirements.md
Normal file
35
specs/031-quality-gates-hygiene/checklists/requirements.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
|
||||
# Specification Quality Checklist: Quality Gates & Code Hygiene
|
||||
|
||||
**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
|
||||
**Created**: 2026-03-10
|
||||
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)
|
||||
|
||||
## Content Quality
|
||||
|
||||
- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
|
||||
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
|
||||
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
|
||||
- [x] All mandatory sections completed
|
||||
|
||||
## Requirement Completeness
|
||||
|
||||
- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
|
||||
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
|
||||
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
|
||||
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
|
||||
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
|
||||
- [x] Edge cases are identified
|
||||
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
|
||||
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified
|
||||
|
||||
## Feature Readiness
|
||||
|
||||
- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
|
||||
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
|
||||
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
|
||||
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification
|
||||
|
||||
## Notes
|
||||
|
||||
- All items pass. The spec references specific files (set-initiative.ts, combatant-row.tsx, biome.json) as context for the hygiene fixes, which is appropriate for a code-quality feature — these are the *targets* of the work, not implementation prescriptions.
|
||||
- Success criteria SC-001 mentions tool names (knip, biome, tsc, vitest, jscpd, pnpm audit) because this feature is specifically about configuring quality tooling — these are the *subject matter*, not implementation details.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user