Delete merged feature branches (005–037) that inflated the auto-increment counter in create-new-feature.sh, and renumber the undo-redo spec to follow the existing 001–005 sequence. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
1.4 KiB
1.4 KiB
Specification Quality Checklist: Undo/Redo
Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning Created: 2026-03-26 Feature: spec.md
Content Quality
- No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
- Focused on user value and business needs
- Written for non-technical stakeholders
- All mandatory sections completed
Requirement Completeness
- No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
- Requirements are testable and unambiguous
- Success criteria are measurable
- Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
- All acceptance scenarios are defined
- Edge cases are identified
- Scope is clearly bounded
- Dependencies and assumptions identified
Feature Readiness
- All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
- User scenarios cover primary flows
- Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
- No implementation details leak into specification
Notes
- All items pass. The spec references "memento pattern" and "localStorage" — these are architectural intent from the issue itself, not implementation leakage. The spec describes what (snapshot-based history, persisted to local storage) not how (no code structure, no framework APIs).
- The "Assumptions" section documents the localStorage sizing assumption and the dependency on #15 being resolved.