Migrate project artifacts to spec-kit format

- Move cross-cutting docs (personas, design system, implementation phases,
  Ideen.md) to .specify/memory/
- Move cross-cutting research and plans to .specify/memory/research/ and
  .specify/memory/plans/
- Extract 5 setup tasks from spec/setup-tasks.md into individual
  specs/001-005/spec.md files with spec-kit template format
- Extract 20 user stories from spec/userstories.md into individual
  specs/006-026/spec.md files with spec-kit template format
- Relocate feature-specific research and plan docs into specs/[feature]/
- Add spec-kit constitution, templates, scripts, and slash commands
- Slim down CLAUDE.md to Claude-Code-specific config, delegate principles
  to .specify/memory/constitution.md
- Update ralph.sh with stream-json output and per-iteration logging
- Delete old spec/ and docs/agents/ directories
- Gitignore Ralph iteration JSONL logs

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
2026-03-06 20:19:41 +01:00
parent 0b2b84dafc
commit 6aeb4b8bca
83 changed files with 6486 additions and 660 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,202 @@
---
date: 2026-03-04T21:15:50+00:00
git_commit: b8421274b47c6d1778b83c6b0acb70fd82891e71
branch: master
topic: "RFC 9457 Problem Details for HTTP API Error Responses"
tags: [research, error-handling, rfc9457, spring-boot, openapi]
status: complete
---
# Research: RFC 9457 Problem Details
## Research Question
How should the fete API structure error responses? What does RFC 9457 (Problem Details) specify, and how does it integrate with Spring Boot 3.5.x, OpenAPI 3.1, and openapi-fetch?
## Summary
RFC 9457 (successor to RFC 7807) defines a standard JSON format (`application/problem+json`) for machine-readable HTTP API errors. Spring Boot 3.x has first-class support via `ProblemDetail`, `ErrorResponseException`, and `ResponseEntityExceptionHandler`. The recommended approach is a single `@RestControllerAdvice` that handles all exceptions consistently — no `spring.mvc.problemdetails.enabled` property, no fallback to legacy error format.
## Detailed Findings
### RFC 9457 Format
Standard fields:
| Field | Type | Description |
|-------|------|-------------|
| `type` | URI | Identifies the problem type. Defaults to `about:blank`. |
| `title` | string | Short, human-readable summary. Should not change between occurrences. |
| `status` | int | HTTP status code. |
| `detail` | string | Human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence. |
| `instance` | URI | Identifies the specific occurrence (e.g. correlation ID). |
Extension members (additional JSON properties) are explicitly permitted. This is the mechanism for validation errors, error codes, etc.
**Key rule:** With `type: "about:blank"`, the `title` must match the HTTP status phrase exactly. Use a custom `type` URI when providing a custom `title`.
### Spring Boot 3.x Built-in Support
- **`ProblemDetail`** — container class for the five standard fields + a `properties` Map for extensions.
- **`ErrorResponseException`** — base class for custom exceptions that carry their own `ProblemDetail`.
- **`ResponseEntityExceptionHandler`** — `@ControllerAdvice` base class that handles all Spring MVC exceptions and renders them as `application/problem+json`.
- **`ProblemDetailJacksonMixin`** — automatically unwraps the `properties` Map as top-level JSON fields during serialization.
### Recommended Configuration
Use a single `@RestControllerAdvice` extending `ResponseEntityExceptionHandler`. Do **not** use the `spring.mvc.problemdetails.enabled` property.
```java
@RestControllerAdvice
public class GlobalExceptionHandler extends ResponseEntityExceptionHandler {
// All Spring MVC exceptions are handled automatically.
// Add @ExceptionHandler methods for domain exceptions here.
// Add a catch-all for Exception.class to prevent legacy error format.
}
```
Reasons to avoid the property-based approach:
1. No place to add custom `@ExceptionHandler` methods.
2. Having both the property AND a custom `ResponseEntityExceptionHandler` bean causes a conflict.
3. The property ignores `server.error.include-*` properties.
### Validation Errors (Field-Level)
Spring deliberately does **not** include field-level validation errors in `ProblemDetail` by default (security rationale). Override `handleMethodArgumentNotValid`:
```java
@Override
protected ResponseEntity<Object> handleMethodArgumentNotValid(
MethodArgumentNotValidException ex,
HttpHeaders headers,
HttpStatusCode status,
WebRequest request) {
ProblemDetail problemDetail = ex.getBody();
problemDetail.setTitle("Validation Failed");
problemDetail.setType(URI.create("urn:problem-type:validation-error"));
List<Map<String, String>> fieldErrors = ex.getBindingResult()
.getFieldErrors()
.stream()
.map(fe -> Map.of(
"field", fe.getField(),
"message", fe.getDefaultMessage()
))
.toList();
problemDetail.setProperty("fieldErrors", fieldErrors);
return handleExceptionInternal(ex, problemDetail, headers, status, request);
}
```
Resulting response:
```json
{
"type": "urn:problem-type:validation-error",
"title": "Validation Failed",
"status": 400,
"detail": "Invalid request content.",
"instance": "/api/events",
"fieldErrors": [
{ "field": "title", "message": "must not be blank" },
{ "field": "expiryDate", "message": "must be a future date" }
]
}
```
### OpenAPI Schema Definition
```yaml
components:
schemas:
ProblemDetail:
type: object
properties:
type:
type: string
format: uri
default: "about:blank"
title:
type: string
status:
type: integer
detail:
type: string
instance:
type: string
format: uri
additionalProperties: true
ValidationProblemDetail:
allOf:
- $ref: '#/components/schemas/ProblemDetail'
- type: object
properties:
fieldErrors:
type: array
items:
type: object
properties:
field:
type: string
message:
type: string
required:
- field
- message
responses:
BadRequest:
description: Validation failed
content:
application/problem+json:
schema:
$ref: '#/components/schemas/ValidationProblemDetail'
NotFound:
description: Resource not found
content:
application/problem+json:
schema:
$ref: '#/components/schemas/ProblemDetail'
```
Use media type `application/problem+json` in response definitions. Set `additionalProperties: true` on the base schema.
### Frontend Consumption (openapi-fetch)
openapi-fetch uses a discriminated union for responses:
```typescript
const { data, error } = await client.POST('/api/events', { body: eventData })
if (error) {
// `error` is typed from the OpenAPI error response schema
console.log(error.title) // "Validation Failed"
console.log(error.fieldErrors) // [{ field: "title", message: "..." }]
return
}
// `data` is the typed success response
```
The `error` object is already typed from the generated schema — no manual type assertions needed for defined error shapes.
### Known Pitfalls
| Pitfall | Description | Mitigation |
|---------|-------------|------------|
| **Inconsistent formats** | Exceptions escaping to Spring Boot's `BasicErrorController` return legacy format (`timestamp`, `error`, `path`), not Problem Details. | Add a catch-all `@ExceptionHandler(Exception.class)` in the `@RestControllerAdvice`. |
| **`server.error.include-*` ignored** | When Problem Details is active, these properties have no effect. | Control content via `ProblemDetail` directly. |
| **Validation errors hidden by default** | Spring returns only `"Invalid request content."` without field details. | Override `handleMethodArgumentNotValid` explicitly. |
| **Content negotiation** | `application/problem+json` is only returned when the client accepts it. `openapi-fetch` sends `Accept: application/json` which Spring considers compatible. | No action needed for SPA clients. |
| **`about:blank` semantics** | With `type: "about:blank"`, `title` must match the HTTP status phrase. Custom titles require a custom `type` URI. | Use `urn:problem-type:*` URIs for custom problem types. |
## Sources
- [RFC 9457 Full Text](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9457.html)
- [Spring Framework Docs: Error Responses](https://docs.spring.io/spring-framework/reference/web/webmvc/mvc-ann-rest-exceptions.html)
- [Swagger Blog: Problem Details RFC 9457](https://swagger.io/blog/problem-details-rfc9457-doing-api-errors-well/)
- [Baeldung: Returning Errors Using ProblemDetail](https://www.baeldung.com/spring-boot-return-errors-problemdetail)
- [SivaLabs: Spring Boot 3 Error Reporting](https://www.sivalabs.in/blog/spring-boot-3-error-reporting-using-problem-details/)
- [Spring Boot Issue #43850: Render global errors as Problem Details](https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-boot/issues/43850)