36 lines
1.5 KiB
Markdown
36 lines
1.5 KiB
Markdown
# Specification Quality Checklist: Quality Gates & Code Hygiene
|
|
|
|
**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
|
|
**Created**: 2026-03-10
|
|
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)
|
|
|
|
## Content Quality
|
|
|
|
- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
|
|
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
|
|
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
|
|
- [x] All mandatory sections completed
|
|
|
|
## Requirement Completeness
|
|
|
|
- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
|
|
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
|
|
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
|
|
- [x] Edge cases are identified
|
|
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
|
|
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified
|
|
|
|
## Feature Readiness
|
|
|
|
- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
|
|
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
|
|
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
|
|
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification
|
|
|
|
## Notes
|
|
|
|
- All items pass. The spec references specific files (set-initiative.ts, combatant-row.tsx, biome.json) as context for the hygiene fixes, which is appropriate for a code-quality feature — these are the *targets* of the work, not implementation prescriptions.
|
|
- Success criteria SC-001 mentions tool names (knip, biome, tsc, vitest, jscpd, pnpm audit) because this feature is specifically about configuring quality tooling — these are the *subject matter*, not implementation details.
|