nitrix
b067c0ef1e
Organizers can now cancel events directly from the event list via the
existing PATCH /events/{eventToken} API. The confirmation dialog shows
role-differentiated messaging: "Cancel event?" with a severity warning
for organizers vs. "Remove event?" for attendees. Responses 204, 409,
and 404 all result in successful removal from the local list.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
36 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
36 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
# Specification Quality Checklist: Cancel Event from Event List
|
|
|
|
**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
|
|
**Created**: 2026-03-12
|
|
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)
|
|
|
|
## Content Quality
|
|
|
|
- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
|
|
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
|
|
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
|
|
- [x] All mandatory sections completed
|
|
|
|
## Requirement Completeness
|
|
|
|
- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
|
|
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
|
|
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
|
|
- [x] Edge cases are identified
|
|
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
|
|
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified
|
|
|
|
## Feature Readiness
|
|
|
|
- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
|
|
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
|
|
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
|
|
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification
|
|
|
|
## Notes
|
|
|
|
- Assumptions section documents that no cancellation reason is needed from the list view (speed over detail). This is a reasonable default; can be revisited via `/speckit.clarify`.
|
|
- All items pass validation. Spec is ready for planning.
|